PSYCHOLOGY 
A C H I E V E M E N T

The invisible downside of

cheating in life

By Tom Stafford, www.bbc.com

September  11th, 2015

 

People who take shortcuts can trick themselves into believing they are smarter than they are, says Tom Stafford, and it comes back to bite them.

---

Honesty may be the best policy, but lying has its merits – even when we are deceiving ourselves. Numerous studies have shown that those who are practised in the art of self-deception might be more successful in the spheres of sport and business. They might even be happier than people who are always true to themselves. But is there ever a downside to believing our own lies?

An ingenious study by Zoe Chance of Yale University tested the idea, by watching what happens when people cheat on tests.

Chance and colleagues ran experiments which involved asking students to answer IQ and general knowledge questions. Half the participants were given a copy of the test paper which had – apparently in error – been printed with the answers listed at the bottom. This meant they had to resist the temptation to check or improve their answers against the real answers as they went along.

Irresistible shortcut

As you'd expect, some of these participants couldn’t help but cheat. Collectively, the group that had access to the answers performed better on the tests than participants who didn't – even though both groups of participants were selected at random from students at the same university, so were, on average, of similar ability.  (We can't know for sure who was cheating – probably some of the people who had answers would have got high scores even without the answers – but it means that the average performance in the group was partly down to individual smarts, and partly down to having the answers at hand.)

---

The crucial question for Chance's research was this: did people in the “cheater” group know that they'd been relying on the answers? Or did they attribute their success in the tests solely to their own intelligence?

The way the researchers tested this was to ask the students to predict how well they'd do on a follow-up test. They were allowed to quickly glance over the second test sheet so that they could see that it involved the same kind of questions – and, importantly, that no answers had been mistakenly been printed at the bottom this time. The researchers reasoned that if the students who had cheated realised that cheating wasn’t an option the second time around, they should predict they wouldn't do as well on this second test.

Not so. Self-deception won the day. The people who'd had access to the answers predicted, on average, that they'd get higher scores on the follow-up – equivalent to giving them something like a 10-point IQ boost. When tested, of course, they scored far lower.

The researchers ran another experiment to check that the effect was really due to the cheaters’ inflated belief in their own abilities. In this experiment, students were offered a cash reward for accurately predicting their scores on the second test. Sure enough, those who had been given the opportunity to cheat overestimated their ability and lost out – earning 20% less than the other students.

---

The implication is that people in Chance's experiment – people very much like you and me – had tricked themselves into believing they were smarter than they were. There may be benefits from doing this – confidence, satisfaction, or more easily gaining the trust of others – but there are also certainly disadvantages. Whenever circumstances change and you need to accurately predict how well you'll do, it can cost to believe you're better than you are.

That self-deception has its costs has some interesting implications. Morally, most of us would say that self-deception is wrong. But aside from whether self-deception is undesirable, we should expect it to be present in all of us to some degree (because of the benefits), but to be limited as well (because of the costs).

Self-deception isn't something that is always better in larger doses – there must be an amount of it for which the benefits outweigh the costs, most of the time. We're probably all self-deceiving to some degree. The irony being, because it is self-deception, we can't know how often.

---

comments powered by Disqus

---

M O R E 
S T O R I E S

L I B R A R Y 
_________________

O T H E R    A R T I C L E S  
O N    
A C H I E V E M E N T :

---

The Psychology Of Loves That Last A Lifetime
READ

Why Leaving your Comfort Zone 
Can Be So Rewarding
READ

On Loving and Being Loved
READ

Curiosity: It Helps Us Learn, But Why?
READ

Why Your Feeling Of Not Having Enough Time Is A Lie
READ

The mental block
READ

Merge the Interests of Your Future & Present Selves
READ

What Actually Makes People Trust You?
READ

The Business Case For Believing In Yourself
READ

Why are Resolutions so hard to follow?
READ

The Disease of Being Busy
READ

Know Your Why: 4 Questions To Tap The Power Of Purpose
READ

Can we cure our expectations?
READ

Is Kindness Physically Attractive?
READ

Is Self-Doubt Holding You Back?
READ

Yes, gender Equality is a Men's Issue
READ

The paradox of knowing.
READ

Why all your little lies aren't harmless as you think.  
READ

How to use your intuition to get ahead.     
READ

3 psychological theories with real insight into how we communicate.
READ

Best of 2013. 
READ

How to make Mondays more productive.
READ

The future of Self-improvement: the dilemma of coaching yourself.
READ

Staying strong under stress.
READ

A guide to the pleasures of work.
READ